The Supreme Court has directed President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to submit a formal response within a non-extendible period of 10 days regarding a petition seeking to compel him to undergo comprehensive physical and mental health examinations.
The resolution, issued during an en banc session on April 23, 2026, also requires Executive Secretary Ralph Recto to comment on the filing.
The petition—spearheaded by former House Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez alongside Virgilio Garcia, Juan Rana, and Raymundo Junia—specifically requests a hair follicle test to screen for potential long-term illegal drug use.
Legal Basis and Public Interest
The petitioners have invoked a writ of mandamus, a judicial remedy used to compel a government official to perform a mandatory duty.
They argue that the President’s state of health is a matter of “utmost concern for the public,” citing constitutional mandates regarding transparency in the event of serious illness.
The filing highlights several concerns regarding the Chief Executive’s recent public conduct, including:
- Allegations of “disturbing behavior and impressions.”
- Instances of purported slurred speech and incoherent statements.
- Reports of undisclosed hospitalizations.
- References to public remarks made by Senator Imee Marcos regarding alleged long-standing drug use.
Malacañang’s Stance
While the Supreme Court clarified that it has not yet given “due course” (merit) to the petition, the mandate for a response signifies a formal commencement of the judicial review process.
The Office of the President and the Presidential Communications Office have consistently dismissed these allegations, maintaining that the President remains in good health and fit for duty.
The High Tribunal now awaits the formal submissions from the Executive branch before determining the next course of legal action.