LACSON QUESTIONS ₱1.9-TRILLION FLOOD CONTROL BUDGET AS SEVERE FLOODING PERSISTS

​Senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson called out the glaring disparity between multi-trillion-peso government allocations for flood mitigation and the relentless inundation sweeping across the country, particularly within Metro Manila.

​The lawmaker raised the issue on Monday night, August 17, as torrential monsoon downpours submerged numerous communities.

​“FLOOD CONTROL VS UNCONTROLLED FLOOD: PhP1.939 trillion funded the DPWH flood control management program under three presidents from 2011-2025 and the result is uncontrolled flood,” Lacson said in a social media post.

​Lacson presented data outlining the Department of Public Works and Highways’ (DPWH) flood management allocations spanning the Aquino, Duterte, and Marcos administrations, highlighting that annual funding breached the ₱100-billion threshold starting in 2018:

  • ​2011: ₱11.323 billion
  • ​2012: ₱10.816 billion
  • ​2013: ₱15.817 billion
  • ​2014: ₱30.001 billion
  • ​2015: ₱47.849 billion
  • ​2016: ₱67.74 billion
  • ​2017: ₱81.223 billion
  • ​2018: ₱139.001 billion
  • ​2019: ₱126.062 billion
  • ​2020: ₱116.047 billion
  • ​2021: ₱140.462 billion
  • ​2022: ₱145.622 billion
  • ​2023: ₱287.018 billion
  • ​2024: ₱346.771 billion
  • ​2025: ₱372.814 billion

​The senator previously highlighted that despite the government disbursing more than ₱1 trillion over the last 15 years—equivalent to approximately ₱350 million daily—flooding problems remain unresolved.

​Through privilege speeches and Senate Blue Ribbon Committee inquiries, the lawmaker has exposed multiple alleged irregularities surrounding flood management infrastructure in provinces like Bulacan and Oriental Mindoro.

​Most recently, Lacson and his investigation team uncovered questionable slope protection projects and unpermitted reclamation operations in Taguig City, a key political bastion of Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano.

​All gathered documentary evidence and investigative findings have been submitted by Lacson to the Office of the Ombudsman for formal review and potential court prosecution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *