Manila, Philippines – June 5, 2025 — The Philippine Senate is facing intense public and political scrutiny following Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa’s admission that he spearheaded the circulation of a draft resolution seeking to effectively dismiss the impending impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte via a “de facto dismissal” mechanism.
This revelation came amid growing criticism from netizens and lawmakers after Senate President Francis “Chiz” Escudero moved to postpone the reading of the Articles of Impeachment to June 11.
In a recent interview with DZBB, 1987 Constitution framer Atty. Christian Monsod voiced concern over the Senate’s actions, saying that the Constitution mandates the upper chamber to immediately convene an impeachment trial once the House of Representatives has transmitted the Articles of Impeachment.
“No,” Monsod firmly responded when asked whether the Senate could dismiss the case without trial.
“Because under the Constitution, it is the duty of the Senate to hear the case. So that’s not hearing the case when you entertain a motion to dismiss.”
Several members of the House of Representatives also condemned what they see as an unconstitutional delay.
Manila 3rd District Rep. Joel Chua asserted that the Senate’s move violates the Constitution and that an impeachment trial must be conducted before any judgment—conviction or acquittal—can be rendered.
“That is unconstitutional. They are violating their constitutional mandate,” Chua said.
Batangas 2nd District Rep. Gerville Luistro echoed the sentiment, stressing that there is no provision in the Constitution allowing the outright dismissal of an impeachment case without a proper trial.
Outgoing Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas and ACT Teachers Party-list Rep. France Castro also decried the Senate’s actions, warning that the corruption allegations facing Vice President Duterte are serious and should not be brushed aside with a mere resolution.
As of writing, neither Senate President Escudero nor the Senate has issued an official statement responding to the mounting criticisms.
The controversy raises constitutional and political questions as the 19th Congress nears the end of its session, with public interest intensifying over how the Senate will handle the high-profile impeachment process.