Manila 3rd District Representative Joel Chua underscored the need for evidence-based accountability in flood control projects, cautioning against the dangers of repeated accusations without substantiation.
He stressed that congressional inquiries must remain grounded in facts and due process, not in public spectacle.
“Repeating a claim does not strengthen it—evidence does,” Chua said, emphasizing that due process protects both the innocent and those found guilty.
Chua argued that the same evidentiary standards should apply to allegations involving former House Speaker and Leyte 1st District Representative Martin Romualdez, who has been accused of benefiting from anomalous flood control transactions. He pointed out that such claims remain unsupported by proof.
He cited a recent Senate Blue Ribbon Committee hearing where Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson acknowledged the lack of sufficient evidence linking Romualdez to the alleged irregularities.
“That statement is factual—there is not enough evidence,” Chua said.
The controversy stems from testimony by two witnesses who claimed that government contractor Curlee Discaya told them Romualdez purchased a house on Tamarind Street in South Forbes Park, Makati City.
Discaya has denied the allegation, stating he has never been to South Forbes Park and has no projects in the area.
Romualdez’s lawyer, Atty. Ade Fajardo, added that Discaya’s denial directly contradicts the witnesses’ claims.
Chua urged fellow lawmakers to redirect discussions toward strengthening flood control systems, safeguards, and project implementation rather than resorting to scapegoating.
He maintained that if evidence exists, it should be presented through proper legal and institutional channels, not amplified through headlines.