Former Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque acknowledged on Monday the Supreme Court ruling dismissing his petition that sought to block the House Quad Committee from compelling his attendance in its investigation into Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs).
In a social media statement, Roque said he understands the legal principle underpinning the decision.
“I fully understand and appreciate the doctrine of mootness. The principle that courts will not decide cases in which no actual controversy remains is fundamental to our legal system.”
Despite this, Roque—who has nearly 20 years of teaching experience in law—argued that exceptions to the mootness doctrine should apply in cases of substantial public interest or recurring issues that evade judicial review.
“I firmly believe that my situation falls within these exceptions. The circumstances surrounding the subpoena issued against me—particularly on matters I consider protected by my right to privacy—present issues that could recur but may consistently escape timely judicial resolution,” he said.
The Supreme Court, sitting en banc, ruled on December 3, 2025, that Roque’s petition for certiorari and prohibition was moot. The decision was only made public on Monday, following the Quad Committee’s lifting of its contempt order against him and the adjournment of the 19th Congress on June 11, 2025.
Roque had earlier been cited in contempt for failing to attend hearings concerning his alleged role as legal counsel for Lucky South 99 Corporation.
He continues to face a non-bailable charge of qualified human trafficking before the Angeles City Regional Trial Court and is among 50 individuals accused of links to the Whirlwind group and Lucky South 99.