LAWYER CLAIMS OMBUDSMAN IS PERSONALLY TARGETING ROMUALDEZ

​The legal defense team of former House Speaker and Leyte 1st District Representative Martin Romualdez has accused the Office of the Ombudsman, led by Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla, of pursuing a personal vendetta against the former lawmaker over the alleged flood control corruption controversy.

​According to Romualdez’s counsel, Atty. Ade Fajardo, the anti-graft body remains fixated on building a case against his client despite a distinct lack of credible evidence.

​Speaking during a radio interview on Wednesday, September 2, Fajardo questioned the Ombudsman’s intense focus on the former House leader.

​“Kami ay naguguluhan kung bakit ganito ang trato nila sa dating Speaker. Masyado na yata siyang pinepersonal,” Fajardo stated.

​“Hindi namin maintindihan kung bakit ganun na lamang ang attention na binibigay nila, ang panggigipit nila kay Rep. Romualdez. Eh wala na namang credible na ebidensiya,” he added.

​Fajardo pointed out that the Ombudsman appears to be single-mindedly targeting Romualdez while letting other top government figures off the hook.

He noted that several high-ranking officials initially implicated by the 18 individuals known as the “Maleta Boys”—who alleged that cash kickbacks for ghost flood control projects were delivered in suitcases—are no longer facing scrutiny.

​“Nawala na nga lahat ng mga malalaking opisyal ng pamahalaan nang mag-urungan ang Maleta boys at nagsabi ang karamihan na wala silang alam sa sinasabing deliveries, tinanggal na sa listahan at siguro in-absolved na. Pero iniiwan pa rin ng Ombudsman at mistulang singled out na natitira na lamang ay ang aming kliyente,” Fajardo emphasized.

​The defense attorney highlighted that five key members of the group, including star witness Orly Guteza, have executed formal affidavits withdrawing their initial claims against Romualdez.

​“Formal affidavit ang ginawa nila, hindi press release,” the legal counsel clarified.

​Fajardo further explained that these retractions were supported by 25 of their peers who disputed the original claims, leaving the Ombudsman’s ongoing investigation against the former Speaker without a solid legal foundation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *