Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla on Sunday firmly rejected demands for his inhibition from the investigation involving former House Speaker Martin Romualdez, who is currently linked to alleged irregularities in flood control projects.
Addressing the issue during a radio broadcast, Remulla argued that withdrawing from the case would contradict his mandate.
He asserted that the Office of the Ombudsman is constitutionally bound to defend the public interest and ensure that those who violate the law are held responsible.
“Paano natin mapaparusahan ‘yan kung mag-i-inhibit ka? Eh duty mo ‘yan eh. ‘Yan ay katungkulan po namin sa Saligang Batas,” Remulla stated.
The Ombudsman brushed off suggestions that he should recuse himself to maintain impartiality, maintaining that his office serves as the nation’s primary watchdog against systemic abuse and graft.
“There is no such thing as inhibition… kami ang bantay ng bayan para ang mga corruption ay mabantayan at mga abuso, mga kapangyarihan ay maawat natin at matigil natin at maparusahan,” he added.
Remulla also targeted critics questioning his authority, suggesting they “go back to law school” for failing to grasp the legal functions of his office.
This response follows accusations from Romualdez’s legal team, who claimed Remulla had already demonstrated bias and prejudgment in the matter.
Compounding the representative’s legal challenges, Remulla confirmed that Romualdez is currently subject to a Court of Appeals freeze order. This legal action has restricted access to 25 bank accounts and 10 insurance policies.
The Ombudsman further disclosed that additional freeze orders are anticipated shortly, as his office prepares to file five to six separate cases related to the investigation.